Author, Nouf Abdul Lateef MS international relations Ripah university
Islamabad
Co-author Dr sheikh Waleed Rasool
Abstract:
Conflict is an inherent aspect of human interaction, stemming from divergent interests,
competing values, and unequal distribution of resources. However, when left
unchecked, conflicts can escalate into violence, displacement, and human suffering,
with far-reaching consequences for individuals, communities, and entire nations. In the
global arena, the resolution of conflicts is imperative for maintaining peace, stability,
and security. International organizations, including the United Nations (UN), regional
bodies, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), play a central role in mediating
disputes, providing humanitarian assistance, and facilitating peacebuilding efforts. By
leveraging their mandates, expertise, and resources, these organizations contribute to
conflict resolution efforts around the world. However, their effectiveness in addressing
conflicts is subject to various challenges and limitations, which warrant closer
examination. he involvement of international organizations in conflict resolution dates
back to the aftermath of World War I, with the establishment of the League of Nations
in 1919. Despite its noble objectives, the League faced inherent limitations, including
the absence of major powers such as the USA, whose decision not to join may have
2
doomed the League to failure, and the inability to enforce collective security measures
effectively.
Introduction:
Following the devastation of World War II, the United Nations was founded in 1945
with a renewed commitment to preventing future conflicts and promoting international
cooperation. Since then, the UN and its specialized agencies have been at the forefront
of conflict resolution efforts, conducting peacekeeping operations, facilitating
diplomatic negotiations, and providing humanitarian aid in conflict-affected regions
worldwide. Notable milestones include the end of colonial conflicts, such as the
independence of Namibia in 1990, and the resolution of interstate disputes, such as the
peace process in Northern Ireland mediated by the UN.
International organizations play multifaceted roles in conflict resolution, encompassing
mediation, peacekeeping, humanitarian assistance, and post-conflict reconstruction.
Mediation efforts by organizations such as the UN aim to facilitate dialogue and
negotiation between conflicting parties, with the goal of reaching mutually acceptable
agreements and preventing the escalation of violence. Peacekeeping missions,
authorized by the UN Security Council, deploy military and civilian personnel to
monitor ceasefires, protect civilians, and facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid in
conflict zones. Humanitarian agencies, such as the International Committee of the Red
Cross (ICRC), provide life-saving assistance to populations affected by conflict,
including food, shelter, and medical care. Additionally, international organizations
support post-conflict reconstruction efforts by promoting reconciliation, rebuilding
infrastructure, and fostering economic development in war-torn societies.The
effectiveness of international organizations in resolving conflicts varies depending on a
myriad of factors, including the nature of the conflict, the level of cooperation among
stakeholders, and the resources available for intervention. While some conflicts have
been successfully resolved through international mediation and peacekeeping, others
have proven more intractable due to deep-rooted political, social, and economic
grievances. Success stories, such as the peace process in Mozambique facilitated by the
UN, demonstrate the potential of international organizations to broker durable peace
agreements and facilitate post-conflict reconstruction. However, challenges such as the
3
resurgence of violence in conflict-affected regions, the persistence of humanitarian
crises, and the spread of extremism underscore the limitations of international efforts in
achieving lasting peace.
Background
Global conflicts have been an inherent aspect of human history, arising from diverse
factors such as political, economic, religious, and territorial disputes. In the
contemporary world, where nations are interconnected through intricate networks of
diplomacy, trade, and communication, the impact of conflicts has the potential to
reverberate far beyond national borders. In addressing and resolving these disputes,
international organizations play a crucial role, serving as mediators, facilitators, and
promoters of peace. This essay explores the multifaceted role of international
organizations in mediating global conflicts, focusing on their functions, challenges, and
the overall impact on fostering global stability.
Theories on international organization in conflict mediation
Conflict Escalation Theory:
This theory posits that unresolved conflicts have the potential to escalate and
spread, leading to wider instability and insecurity beyond their immediate
geographic location. Effective mediation efforts are essential for preventing
conflicts from escalating and mitigating their adverse effects on global
stability.
Security Dilemma Theory:
According to this theory, actions taken by states to enhance their own security
can inadvertently provoke insecurity and conflict with other states,
contributing to a spiral of mistrust and competition. Mediation efforts aim
to address underlying security dilemmas and promote cooperative security
arrangements to enhance global stability.
Complex Interdependence Theory:
Complex interdependence theory suggests that states are increasingly
interconnected through economic, political, and social ties, making them
more vulnerable to the consequences of conflicts in other parts of the world.
4
Mediation efforts seek to manage interdependencies, reduce vulnerabilities,
and promote cooperation to maintain global stability.
Conflict Resolution Theory:
Conflict resolution theory emphasizes the importance of addressing
underlying causes of conflicts, such as grievances, inequalities, and
identitybased tensions, to achieve sustainable peace. Mediation efforts focus
on facilitating dialogue, building trust, and finding mutually acceptable
solutions to conflicts to promote long-term stability.
Human Security Theory:
Human security theory highlights the importance of protecting individuals and
communities from various threats, including armed conflict, displacement,
and human rights abuses. Mediation efforts prioritize the protection of
civilians, humanitarian assistance, and respect for human rights to enhance
global stability and well-being.
Peacebuilding Theory:
- Peacebuilding theory emphasizes the need for comprehensive and inclusive
approaches to peace, addressing not only the cessation of hostilities but also
the underlying drivers of conflicts and building sustainable peace. Mediation
efforts integrate peacebuilding strategies, including reconciliation,
governance reform, and socio-economic development, to promote stability
and resilience.
Power Transition Theory: - Power transition theory suggests that shifts in the distribution of power
among states can lead to competition, conflicts, and instability. Mediation
efforts aim to manage power transitions peacefully, prevent hegemonic
challenges, and promote stability through diplomatic engagement and
conflict resolution.
Constructivist Theory: - Constructivist theory emphasizes the role of ideas, norms, and identities in
shaping state behavior and international relations. Mediation efforts seek to
promote normative stability by reinforcing principles of peaceful conflict
resolution, human rights, and multilateral cooperation, thereby contributing
to global stability.
5
Environmental Conflict Theory:
- Environmental conflict theory explores the relationship between
environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and conflict. Mediation
efforts address environmental drivers of conflicts, promote sustainable
resource management, and mitigate the adverse impacts of environmental
degradation on global stability.
Network Theory:
Network theory examines the interconnectedness of actors and relationships in
shaping conflict dynamics and outcomes. Mediation efforts leverage networks of
stakeholders, including states, international organizations, civil society groups, and
regional actors, to build consensus, mobilize resources, and promote collective
action for global stability.
Functions of International Organizations in Conflict Mediation:
- Facilitating Communication and Dialogue:
International organizations serve as intermediaries, creating opportunities
for conflicting parties to communicate and engage in dialogue. They
establish channels for communication, whether through formal
negotiations, informal talks, or facilitated dialogues. By providing a
neutral space and platform for interaction, they help conflicting parties
to express grievances, clarify positions, and explore potential solutions
to the conflict. - Promoting Diplomatic Solutions:
Through various diplomatic channels, international organizations
advocate for peaceful resolution of conflicts. They encourage conflicting
parties to seek diplomatic solutions rather than resorting to violence.
This may involve offering diplomatic support, including hosting peace
talks, providing diplomatic mediators, or engaging in shuttle diplomacy
to facilitate communication between parties. By promoting dialogue and
negotiation, they aim to find mutually acceptable solutions and prevent
further escalation of the conflict.
- Providing Neutrality and Impartiality:
6
International organizations maintain neutrality and impartiality in conflict
mediation to build trust among conflicting parties. They do not take sides
or favor any particular party, but instead focus on facilitating a fair and
balanced negotiation process. This neutrality helps to create an
environment where all parties feel comfortable expressing their concerns
and engaging in constructive dialogue. By being perceived as neutral
actors, international organizations increase the likelihood of cooperation
and successful mediation outcomes.
- Offering Technical Expertise and Resources:
International organizations bring technical expertise, resources, and
support to assist in conflict mediation efforts. They deploy trained
mediators, conflict resolution specialists, legal advisors, and other
professionals who possess the skills and knowledge necessary to
facilitate productive negotiations. Additionally, they provide logistical
support, such as meeting facilities, translation services, and
communication tools, to ensure smooth coordination and
communication between parties. By offering technical assistance and
resources, international organizations enhance the effectiveness of
mediation processes and increase the chances of reaching a sustainable
peace agreement.
- Monitoring and Implementing Peace Agreements:
- Once a peace agreement is reached, international organizations play a
crucial role in monitoring its implementation to ensure compliance by
all parties. They may deploy peacekeeping missions or observer teams
to monitor ceasefire arrangements, disarmament processes, and the
delivery of humanitarian aid to conflict-affected areas. Through regular
monitoring and reporting, they help hold parties accountable for their
commitments and identify any violations or challenges that may arise.
By actively overseeing the implementation of peace agreements,
international organizations contribute to building trust and confidence
among conflicting parties and support the consolidation of peace and
stability.
- Building Capacity for Conflict Resolution:
7
- International organizations invest in building local capacity for conflict
resolution by providing training, resources, and support to empower
local actors and institutions. They offer training programs, workshops,
and skill-building initiatives for mediators, peacebuilders, community
leaders, and civil society organizations in conflict-affected regions. By
strengthening the capacity of local stakeholders to manage and resolve
conflicts peacefully, international organizations contribute to sustainable
peacebuilding efforts and help prevent the recurrence of violence in the
future.
- Advocating for Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding:
- In addition to immediate mediation efforts, international organizations
advocate for long-term conflict prevention and peacebuilding initiatives.
They support efforts to address root causes of conflict, including
poverty, inequality, injustice, and governance issues. Through advocacy,
research, and policy engagement, they promote sustainable
development, strengthen governance structures, and foster reconciliation
and social cohesion. By addressing underlying drivers of conflict and
promoting inclusive and participatory approaches to peacebuilding,
international organizations contribute to building resilient and peaceful
societies.
Challenges in Mediating Global Conflicts:
- Complexity of Conflicts:
- Global conflicts often involve multiple actors with diverse interests,
ideologies, and grievances. These conflicts may be rooted in historical,
ethnic, religious, or geopolitical factors, making them inherently complex to
8
address. International organizations must navigate intricate dynamics and
power struggles between parties, which can hinder efforts to facilitate
dialogue and reach consensus-based solutions.
- Lack of Trust and Credibility:
- Building trust among conflicting parties is essential for effective mediation,
but it can be challenging to establish trust in environments characterized by
deep-seated animosities, past betrayals, and ongoing violence. Conflicting
parties may perceive international organizations as biased or serving the
interests of external powers, undermining their credibility as neutral
mediators. Overcoming skepticism and building trust requires sustained
engagement, transparency, and consistent demonstration of impartiality.
- Limited Cooperation and Compliance:
- Conflicting parties often have divergent goals and may be unwilling to
cooperate or comply with mediation efforts. Some parties may resort to
stalling tactics, manipulation, or outright rejection of peace initiatives to
pursue their objectives through military means or other strategies.
International organizations must navigate resistance and reluctance to
engage in meaningful dialogue, which can impede progress towards
peaceful resolution.
- Resource Constraints:
- Mediating global conflicts requires substantial financial, human, and
logistical resources. International organizations may face constraints in
terms of funding, staffing, and operational capacity, limiting their ability to
sustain long-term mediation efforts. Moreover, conflicts often demand rapid
responses and flexibility to adapt to evolving dynamics, posing additional
challenges for resource allocation and management.
- Political Obstacles and Interference:
- Political considerations and power dynamics at the international and
regional levels can complicate mediation efforts. External actors may exert
influence or pressure on conflicting parties to advance their own interests,
undermining the autonomy and effectiveness of mediation processes.
Political rivalries, competing agendas, and geopolitical rivalries may further
complicate efforts to achieve consensus and implement peace agreements.
9
- Insecurity and Risks to Mediators:
- Mediators and peacekeeping personnel deployed by international
organizations face significant security risks in conflict-affected areas. They
may be exposed to violence, targeted attacks, kidnapping, and other security
threats from armed groups or spoilers seeking to disrupt peace efforts.
Ensuring the safety and security of mediators and peacekeepers is
paramount but requires robust security measures and coordination with local
authorities and security forces.
- Inadequate Local Ownership and Participation:
- Sustainable peace requires the active involvement and ownership of local
stakeholders, including communities, civil society organizations, and
grassroots leaders. However, international mediation processes may
sometimes lack inclusivity and fail to adequately involve local actors in
decision-making and peacebuilding efforts. This can undermine the
legitimacy and sustainability of peace agreements and perpetuate grievances
and tensions within affected communities.
- Fragmentation and Coordination Challenges:
The involvement of multiple international organizations, regional bodies,
governments, and non-state actors in conflict mediation efforts can lead to
fragmentation and coordination challenges. Lack of coherence, duplication
of efforts, and conflicting mandates among mediators and peacebuilding
initiatives may undermine the effectiveness and coherence of mediation
processes. Achieving synergy and coordination among diverse stakeholders
is essential for maximizing impact and promoting sustainable peace
outcomes.
10
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
Scholars have studied the topic of IO and mediation with different methods. Multiple
approaches that combine diverse (theoretical and) methodological ways are necessary
in order to derive findings that can improve our understanding of the practice and
performance of mediation in a comprehensive way (Bercovitch 1996). On one hand,
Crocker, et al. 2001 compiled a rich and detailed set of case studies on mediation, with
a particular focus on multiparty mediation. The more recent work Bakaki 2016
describes mediation offered by NATO in the Cod Wars to make causal inferences
regarding formal and informal mediation procedures. On the other hand, quantitative
(large-N) studies seek to provide a general overview of the characteristics of IOs that
increase the likelihood of conflict resolution. For instance, Bercovitch and Gartner 2006
thoroughly examined conflict management outcomes and suggested that mediating
actors, the strategy they choose, and previous mediation experiences are some of the
influential elements for the nature of a conflict management outcome. Bercovitch and
Schneider 2000 examine the identity of mediators and the factors determining the
choice of mediators. The authors test their hypotheses with a multivariate event count
model using an original dataset on international mediation since 1950 and find that
powerful states and IOs are the most prominent choices for mediator
The impact of global conflicts and their mediation efforts on global
stability
- Economic Stability:
11
- Global conflicts can disrupt economic activities, trade routes, and
investment flows, leading to economic instability and uncertainty.
Mediation efforts that successfully resolve conflicts or mitigate their impact
can contribute to restoring confidence, promoting economic growth, and
fostering stability in affected regions and beyond.
- Political Stability:
- Prolonged conflicts and political instability in one region can have spillover
effects, destabilizing neighboring countries and even entire regions.
Mediation efforts that prevent conflicts from escalating or facilitate peaceful
resolutions can help preserve political stability, prevent the spread of
violence, and mitigate the risk of regional destabilization.
- Social Stability:
- Conflicts often result in humanitarian crises, displacement, and social
upheaval, exacerbating tensions and undermining social cohesion. Effective
mediation efforts that address underlying grievances, promote
reconciliation, and support sustainable peacebuilding contribute to restoring
social stability, rebuilding trust, and fostering inclusive societies.
- Security Stability:
- Global conflicts can pose security threats beyond their immediate
geographic context, including terrorism, proliferation of weapons, and
refugee flows. Mediation efforts that address root causes of conflicts, disarm
armed groups, and strengthen governance institutions contribute to
enhancing security stability and reducing the risk of transnational security
threats.
- Environmental Stability:
- Conflicts can have detrimental impacts on the environment, including
deforestation, pollution, and degradation of natural resources, exacerbating
environmental vulnerabilities and undermining sustainability. Mediation
efforts that promote environmental protection, sustainable resource
management, and climate resilience contribute to environmental stability
and support long-term peacebuilding efforts.
12
Discussion
- Empirical Evidence:
- Empirical research examines specific cases of conflict mediation
involving international organizations, such as the United Nations,
regional bodies like the African Union or the European Union, and
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Researchers analyze the
strategies, tactics, and outcomes of mediation efforts in different
contexts to identify patterns, best practices, and lessons learned.
- Impact Assessment:
- Research assesses the impact of international organization-mediated
conflict resolution efforts on various dimensions, including peace and
stability, human rights, development, and governance. Scholars examine
the effectiveness of mediation processes in preventing, managing, or
resolving conflicts, as well as their long-term implications for
sustainable peace and security.
- Mediation Processes and Mechanisms:
- Studies delve into the mediation processes and mechanisms employed
by international organizations, including facilitation of dialogue,
negotiation, ceasefire agreements, peacekeeping operations, and
postconflict reconstruction. Researchers analyze the role of mediators,
the dynamics between conflicting parties, and the influence of external
actors in shaping mediation outcomes.
- Challenges and Limitations:
- Research identifies challenges and limitations faced by international
organizations in mediating conflicts, such as political constraints, lack
of resources, limited mandate, and complexity of conflicts. Scholars
explore how these challenges impact the effectiveness and credibility of
mediation efforts and propose strategies for overcoming them.
- Normative and Ethical Considerations:
13
- Research examines the normative and ethical dimensions of
international organization-mediated conflict mediation, including issues
of neutrality, impartiality, and accountability. Scholars explore ethical
dilemmas faced by mediators, such as balancing the principles of
sovereignty and intervention, ensuring inclusivity and representation,
and upholding human rights and humanitarian norms.
Recommendations
Research in this field informs policy and practice by providing evidence-based
recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of international
organizationmediated conflict mediation. Scholars highlight the importance of
multilateral cooperation, capacity-building, diplomatic engagement, and long-
term peacebuilding efforts in promoting sustainable peace and stability.
Conclusion
Intractable conflicts are driven by antagonists with a strong sense of identity, grievance
of some sort (economic or political), and a desire to use violence to change the status
quo. In places as diverse as Israel, Sudan, Northern Ireland, Congo, Cyprus, Korea,
Kashmir, and many others, intractable conflicts are responsible for continued violence
and loss of lives. These conflicts threaten regional order and international stability. It is
hard to get out of an intractable situation. Hard, but not impossible. There is nothing
pre-ordained about the path of any conflict, intractable or otherwise. What I have tried
to suggest above is that mediation may offer the prospect of escaping the dilemmas of
intractability.
Mediation offers the possibility of a jointly acceptable outcome without giving in on
one’s core values and beliefs. Under some conditions mediation can actually break
through an intractable cycle of violence. The availability of suitable mediators may help
to transform an intractable conflict and produce a sustained agreement. For this to
happen certain conditions have to be present. When the circumstances are indeed
propitious, few processes can do more to reduce intractability of a conflict than a
wellplanned mediation. We should be aware of these conditions and do our best to bring
intractable conflicts to an end.
14
References
https://www.academia.edu/download/51688850/Mediating_interstate_conflicts_R
egional_20170207-4866-15kt5eg.pdf
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022343300037002002
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcms.12254
